The people must do what is right and get rid of unpopular leaders!

The people also must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders who make policies that does not benefit them, to stay in power.

The people must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders to enjoy million dollar pay package.

The people must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders who use public funds to build casinos and destroy the future generation.

The people must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders to treat them like second-class or third-class citizens.

The people must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders to impose their hegemony on the people.

The people must do what is right and not allow unpopular leaders to rule with draconian laws.

The people must do what is right to correct the wrongs of these unpopular leaders and teach them a lesson.

Wong Kan Seng: Leaders must do what is right and not what is popular


In a luncheon address to think tanks and business leaders at the fifth Asia Economic Summit about what makes good governance and strong leadership today, Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng said that leaders may have to find the platform and momentum to drive difficult reforms in a crisis.

Mr Wong did not quote any specific examples of the possible crises faced by Asian countries nor the reforms to undertake.

“Leaders must have the conviction to do what is right and not what is popular, even if taking that path may not win them political points.” he said.

Mr Wong, who is also the Home Affairs minister acknowledged that businesses and employees would be reluctant to see the withdrawal of temporary support measures put in place during the downturn in a probable reference to the Jobs Credits Scheme introduced at the beginning of the year to help Singapore companies tide over the recession.

“In such a situation, leaders must have the conviction to push through what needs to be done, rather than what is politically expedient or populist,” Mr Wong added.

Due to the lack of an opposition in parliament to check on the ruling party to which Mr Wong belongs, Singapore’s leaders are able to implement unpopular policies with little or no resistance from the citizenry such as its liberal immigration and pro-foreigner policies.

It is unlikely that other Asian leaders who have to face a demanding and critical electorate will be able to emulate the governing style of Singapore leaders who have no qualms ramming down unpopular policies down the throats of Singaporeans.

Taiwanese President Ma Ying-Jeou’s approval dropped to 33 per cent following Taiwan’s elections for county mayors and magistrates which saw his ruling Kuomintang lost a large number of votes compared to the previous election.

44 percent of the interviewees cited the pushing of an economic cooperation agreement framework with the Chinese mainland as a reason for disapproving his performance so far.

Unlike Taiwan and other Asian democracies, Singapore does not conduct any opinion polls for its leaders. Public show of dissent against the government is outlawed. The media sings only the praises of the ruling party and there is no opposition to challenge it in parliament.

Though Singapore conducts elections regularly since independence, it is a shoo-in for the incumbent as the opposition is the perenially weak and divided opposition is no match for the ruling party which controls all institutions of the state.

Under such “unique” circumstances, it is no surprise that Mr Wong can say it so confidently that leaders must have the “conviction” to do what is right rather than popular.

Mr Wong’s track record in government has been blotched by the sensational escape of famed terrorist Mas Selamat Kasteri who managed to evade his captors for four days in Singapore before swimming undetected across international waters to Malaysia.

In any other democracies, the minister in charge will probably be forced to apologize to the public and even resign. Not only does Mr Wong need not do so, he remains as secure in his position as ever.

When asked by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong if Mr Wong should resign, Mr Low Thia Kiang, one of the only two non-PAP opposition MPs in parliament was stunned into a moment of silence.

With Singapore’s brand of “non-confrontational” politics which is not seen elsewhere, it is little wonder that Singapore leaders will never have experience political pressure of any sort from a subservient people.

Menteri Melayu terketar-ketar buat orang tersentak...

"Saya malu, awak tahu tak? Lesemuanya melibatkan keluarga Melayu.
Aawak lihat, perinciannya adalah klasik - kahwin muda, dah tu bercerai,
tiada kawalan ibu bapa, melibatkan diri dalam kumpulan haram.
Kami tahu semua ini. Sekarang kita mulai melihat kesan akibat semua daripada ini.
Anak-anak kecil terkorban kerana mereka. Jika ini tidak menyentakkan masyarakat kita,
saya tidak tahu apa lagi."

- Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, dengan nada suara yang bergetar.
(Berita Minggu, 6 Disember)

Ada yang akan menuduh saya tidak konsisten. Sekejap boikot, dah tu "quote" dari BH/BM. Ini bukan kerana saya beli suratkhabar sampah tu. Cuma, kebetolan bapa saya beli dan kebetolan saya TERSENTAK membaca komentar Tan Sri kita ni.

Dulu kata Masyarakat Melayu Singapura lagi bagus daripada Orang Melayu Malaysia dan Indonesia. Konon maju dalam semua bidang dan tidak mengharapkan kerajaan untuk bantuan. Mereka di basuhkan dengan "berita-berita kejayaan orang Melayu" tiap-tiap hari. Yang masuk universiti, yang pergi merantau, yang buka kedai dan macam-macam lagi.

Macamlah orang Indon tu bodoh sangat. Wang korupsi yang masuk Singapura berguni-guni tak cakap pulak. Muka tak tahu malu. Kalau nak dibandingkan orang pandai di Indonesia tu dengan orang Singapura, bagaikan langit dengan bumi. Cuba tengok standard pimpinan Muhammadiyah Singapura dan Indonesia. Muhammadiyah Indonesia dipimpin para intelektual dan ulama'. Jadi jangan teruskan dakyah bodoh yang sudah bankrap ini. Yang lagi satu, awak boleh selidik sendiri.

Datang satu hamba sahaya PAP, nama dia Kartini Khalid dengan komen mengampu lagi menunjukkan kebodohan serta kedunguan yang teramat sangat. Kata dia, waktu pergi Negeri Sembilan, tak nampak orang bangsa lain.

"After the first four days in the village, I felt something was amiss. I could not put a finger on what it was. It was only when I was hanging out at a roadside stall and saw a Chinese man that it dawned on me what I was missing: I had not seen a single non-Malay person (outside of my student group) for four whole days!"

- http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/36725-proud-to-be-a-malay-singaporean--khartini-khalidl

Betol-betol buta saya rasa orang ni. Saya pergi sana yang jual nasi kandar tu mamak. Si Kartini mungkin kerana dah terlalu juling disebabkan keangkuhan dan stereotype, membuat komen seperti ini. Kontradiksi antara komen Dr Yaacob dan Si Kartini ni. Satu risau, satu bangga.

Saya tidak perlu statistik untuk bersetuju dengan Tan Sri ini. Jalan-jalan di tempat-tempat membeli-belah sahaja, dah boleh nampak mat dan minah tatoo, minah bunting, mat motor, minah blonde dan sebagainya. Saya sudah malas untuk menegur orang tentang soal moraliti. Pada saya moraliti ada manifestasi daripada kepercayaan dan nilai hidup manusia tersebut.

Tak ada guna nak tegur, kerana mereka akan buat balik. Ditambahkan dengan cara hidup yang ada di mana orang ramai dialihkan pandangan mereka kepada budaya hedonisma daripada menghayati budaya ilmu. Singapore Idol la, Anugerah la, cerita-cerita keluarga terpecah dan terburai keluaran Suria dan lain-lain lagi. Cara yang boleh mengubah adalah dengan kembali kepada penghayatan Islam.

Tetapi bila ada yang ingin menghayati agama dan isi nya, duduk di masjid dan bercakap tentang agama, mengajar manusia di rumah-rumah mereka, orang-orang ini semua dilecehkan dengan soal tauliah. Hal yang akan menyelesaikan masalah manusia iaitu ad-Din dilecehkan, yang merosakkan seperti hiburan ini dipermudahkan. Inilah hakikatnya di Singapura.

Kerajaan yang begitu sebok untuk menyesatkan manusia melalui khutbah-khutbah MUIS pada Jumaat. Khutbah tidak lagi menimbulkan isu permasalahan umat secara radikal sehingga membangkitkan kesedaran untuk berubah. Tetapi dilemaukan dengan tok lebai dan mat lembik yang menyampaikan khutbah. Khutbah baca teks cetakan daulah. Ia hanya bertujuan untuk mengolah opini umum untuk menyokong projek-projek dan polisi-polisi daulah.

Masalah moral Melayu Singapura adalah disebabkan penghayatan agama yang semakin menipis. Orang yang ingin menyampaikan dikekang dan ditentang. Yang ingin membawa perubahan dikatakan tidak ada tauliah, yang mnyesatkan orang dikatakan ada tauliah. Ini semua adalah perbuatan yang didalangi daulah dengan propaganda "War on Terrorism". Inilah akibat hidup dibuaikan dengan propaganda.

Saya bertulis begini bukan bererti saya ni alim ulama', pakai jubah dan jalan kepala tunduk. Tetap saya benar-benar merasakan bahawa negara ini mempunyai krisis spiritualiti yang amat kronik. Ini terkesan pada jiwa saya dan saya merasakan kehilangan sesuatu. Mudah-mudahan Allah selamatkan kita semua.

P/S: Suara terketar-ketar ke...bergetar-getar ke...ni semua adalah cara mencari simpati untuk hari ngundi...
duit rakyat digunakan untuk membuat kasino...nak cakap pasal moral?
gaji menteri juta-juta...nak cakap pasal moral?...
Banjir dekat bukit Timah...nak cakap pasal freak moral?...
Hentikan pembohongan...Orang dah menyampah...

Al-Qaradawi: Qutb’s thought does not seem to belong to Brotherhood or Sunnis.

Sunday, October 11,2009 19:20

IkhwanWeb

The Islamic preacher and scholar Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi claimed that the Muslim Brotherhood had never adopted the excommunication violence ideology. In fact, the ideas the Islamic intellectual Sayed Qutb conveyed in his writings were not compatible with the path of the followers of Al Sunnah and Jama'ah, He cast blame on Qutb for his excommunicating ideologies rather than the Muslim Brotherhood. Qaradawi explained that the Muslim Brotherhood does not deal with the radical ideology; in fact the thought of the Brotherhood is non-radical.

Qaradawi' historical testimony about Sayed Qutb reported in an interview with Dr. Diaa Rashwan, an expert on Islamic movement’s, in his TV show "sermons and canons” on Al Faraeen Channel opened the door for discussion on Qutb's' ideological thought debating whether it was relevant, ranking or belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood. Did he belong to the Brotherhood, Salafi or associate himself with the jihad movement?

Moderate thinking
Read:

- Sayed Qutb lies outside the circle of suspicion... But! (File)
- QARADAWI questions Do Sayed Qutb accuses Muslims today with atheism?

-QARADAWI’s reproach on Qutb

In his speech aired on Friday, July 8, 2009 on Faraeen Channel, he claimed that in the 1950's Sayed Qutb belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood. He willingly and contentedly joined the Muslim Brotherhood, indicating that this remarkable shift from moderation to militancy in his thoughts was patent in his late writings particularly in his most common interpretation of “In the Shade of the Qur’an" and his renewed book "Milestones on the road". Qaradawi emphasized the change when comparing the first edition “In the Shade of the Qur’an"” with the second edition in which he started speaking about the ignorance of divine guidance “jahiliyyah” and the “governance of God” in Islam.

Qaradawi emphasized "The line of thought of Sayed Qutb was written during the last phase of his life affirming the somewhat deviation from the right path of the followers of Al Sunnah and Al Jama'ah," Al Sunnah followers refrain from accusing any person of atheism unless “there are decisive and conclusive evidences proving that the individual has completely turned back from Islam."

“I believe that in this regard, Sayyed Qutb had missed the right path of Al Sunnah and Al Jama'ah followers where he refers to several reasons most significantly in his deepest and most profound writings of his imprisonment," he asserted. He firmly believed that the State had deviated from the Islamic approach empowered by the communists.

Al-Qaradawi perceived if it was predetermined for Sheikh Qutb to survive after his term of imprisonment and had gotten involved in dialogue and debated his ideas; certainly he would have given up many of his ideas just as his brother Muhammad Qutb had put away the idea of public penance. Because his ideas directly threatened the legitimacy of Nasser’s government, Qutb was rearrested and sentenced to death in August 29, 1965.

Qutb and the doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood

In response to whether or not Sayed Qutb could be classified as connected to the mainstream of the Muslim Brotherhood’s school, Qaradawi asserted that Sayed Qutb was a great admirer of the Imam Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood movement. He wrote about him in his article "Hassan Al-Banna and the genius of building", reflecting al-Bannas’ ability to organize, manage and take charge of the movements' structure.

Qutb did not transcribe al-Banna’s thought as much as he quoted from Sheikh Abu al-Ala Maududi. Qutb was deeply influenced by Maududi and learned from the theory of “Jahiliyyah and Governance”. However, Qutb ultimately concluded that his theory of the entire non Islamic community's ignoring of the divine guidance differed to the opinion of Maududi.

The Governance ideology is unimpeachable, although it is an intrinsic Islamic idea, Qaradawi maintained. "That is to say, in fact, the Islamic law is the only source of legislation which Imam Abu-Hamid Al-Ghazzali and other Muslim scholars referred to," he continued.

Qutb's fundamental criticism of all systems of life which he views as non-Islamic is that they are "jahiliyyah” for Qutb, it completely differs with what is written in the Holy Quran according to Al-Qaradawi on citing by Qutb in his book "Milestones on the road". Qutb considered that the community is mainly non-Islamic and the reformers’ task is to initially bring back people to the right Islamic doctrine testifying that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.

Qaradawi underscored that Qutb erred not only when he accused the ruling Muslim regimes but also the Muslim masses with infidelity explaining that Qutb bore some responsibility for the atonement. Qutb borrowed Maududi ideas and generated results that were not arranged or thought of by Maududi, and put them into practice. The same also was exercised by Mustafa Shukri and others where they borrowed Qutb's' ideas. Shukri regarded the "Muslim community" as the only Muslims while others are infidels.

"Jahiliyyah" and trial thought of Sayed Qutb

Qaradawi, however, denied, that his testimony against Qutb writings as a mere fabricated lie, adding that he judged him through his own writings and texts contained in his books. In response to these claims the Secretary-General of the Muslim Brotherhood and one of its leading figures Mahmoud Ezzat, asserted that the real mistake is the misunderstanding of Sayed Qutb and not what was written by Sayed Qutb.

Qaradawi argued that the words quoted by Qutb about the apostasy and jahiliyyah are plain, citing the novel of Dr. Mohammad Abdullah al-Mahdi who was detained in 1965. Qutb assured that his writings in the first phase of his career like "Social Justice in Islam", "World’s Peace and Islam", and "scenes of the Resurrection in the Qur'an," did not represent his view or the new doctrine. However, the new trend that he adopted and pursued was proved in his last book when he was in prison when he wrote "milestones on the road", and the second edition “In the shade of the Quran", "This is religion of Islam” and "Islam and the problems of civilization."

Al Qaradawi stressed that anyone contemplating the writings of Sayed Qutb will undoubtedly affirm that Qutb had exaggerated in the excommunication issue, confirming that Qutb's method is not the Muslim Brotherhood method that the Imam Al Banna based his foundations on in "the twenty origins ". He pointed out that Qutb was not brought up among the group's members nor was he raised to fight their cause. In fact his presence among the Brotherhood's members was short and no sooner had he entered the prison the changes to his ideologies appeared.

Qaradawi stated that attributing Sayed Qutb to The Brotherhood or any other movement is not significant, however what is significant are his thoughts, saying: "We judge and criticize writings and ideas and only who write and bring about these ideas should be held responsible and not the Muslim Brothers... I believe that these ideas are not compatible with the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology because the movement embraces only peace in its manners.

Is he a MB member or jihadist or Salafist?

Qutb, in fact, was excited by Imam Hassan Al-Banna. However, he was not impressed with his ideas and what appeared in his writings.

A controversy was stirred up about the thoughts of Qutb among the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafi and jihadist movements, Qaradawi explained. This debate was attributed to his thoughts that formed a strong ground for jihadists quoting and taking advantage. Salafi movements also refer to his ideas; however, they did not recognize him as a Salafi belonging to them because he was always smoothly-shaven where Salafis wore beards... The Brotherhood also benefited from his ideas, emphasizing that they still read selected writings of Sayed Qutb and take what they see may be beneficial. Accordingly, his writings are very useful.

Al-Qaradawi cautioned everyone who reads Qutb’s publication from falling into the trap of his thoughts particularly since he was a great influential writer and thinker. He wrote these books in moments of spiritual purity and sincerity with himself and had a talent for writing that attracts the reader which if allowed will strongly affect him.

Qaradawi concluded that despite the fact that his testimony and disagreement with Qutb’s blasphemed ideas where his theory was not of the followers of the entire Muslim world, "this does not stop me from asserting that this man was a great and influential writer in terms of creativity and a good literary critic. Sayyed Qutb was a great preacher and thinker and a brilliant Muslim gaining this great grandeur not only of his ideas but also through his self-sacrifice. He sacrificed himself as redemption for his call and for the sake of the Almighty Allah.

Source: http://ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=21267

P/S: I highlighted the last paragraph for the benefit of "concerned people around the world". If your intellectual capabilities too low to understand, then you might consider going back to school.

UAE investor concern over repayment

PEPSI DAN COKE – ADIDAS DAN PUMA: HISHAMUDDIN RAIS

WALAU PUN TULISAN ARAB - IANYA MASIH MILIK MUSUH UMAT MANUSIA

PEPSI DAN COKE – ADIDAS DAN PUMA

Pada tahun 2009 ini wacana politik dalam negara kita cuba menyebarkan berita tentang kemungkinan terwujudnya sistem dua parti – Barisan Nasional dan Pakatan Rakyat. Malah huh hah huh hah tentang sistem dua parti ini telah tersebar lama. Ada yang menyeringai gembira seperti di malam pertama bedua-duaan di bilik bersama kekasih bila mendengar kemungkinan ini.

Sistem dua parti ini adalah satu penipuan. Satu illusi yang dirancang oleh kaum pemodal. Satu pemesongan projek demokrasi yang amat terancang untuk mengkaburi mata orang ramai agar gagal melihat intipati politik dan makna hakiki demokrasi.

Lalu saya bertanya adakah sesiapa yang dapat membezakan Pepsi dengan Coke? Adakah sesiapa yang dapat membezakan Adidas dengan Puma? Hakikatnya - pemilik saham Pepsi adalah juga pemilik saham Coke. Hakikatnya - Puma dan Adidas adalah dua beradik yang membuka peniagaan yang sama – satu kedai di kiri jalan dan sebuah lagi di kanan jalan. Kedua-duanya mengamalkan sistem kapitalis yang berlandaskan keuntungan. Yang membezakan hanya ejaan nama yang bermula dengan A dan P.

Kita wajib sedar bahawa kaum pemodal akan terus merancang untuk memastikan kepentingan ekonomi mereka selamat. Apa yang mereka pertahankan bukan saekar kebun getah atau sebuah Kancil. Yang mereka pertahankan ialah sistem ekonomi kapitalis yang selama 150 tahun ini telah mengembongkan saku dan dompet mereka. Sistem ini telah menjadikan mereka senang lenang dan kaya raya dengan harta berbilion-bilion dolar dan ringgit.

Kuasa yang mengancam dan menyusahkan kehidupan umat manusia dalam dunia hari ini sebenarnya adalah kuasa kaum pemodal. Kaum pemodal inilah yang merancang untuk memastikan parti apa yang naik and parti apa yang turun. Siapa dapat jadi menteri dan siapa yang akan dipencenkan. Para politikus dalam sistem kapitalis ini hanyalah Mat Heboh yang diupah berlabun di parlimen untuk mengubal undang-udang dan memastikan kepentingan kaum pemodal dijaga rapi.

Perhatikan bagaimana undang-undang yang diluluskan di parlimen TIDAK akan dan TIDAK pernah menyebelahi kepada kepentingan kaum buruh atau kaum pekerja. Perhatikan cukai mukai yang di kenakan. Pemotongan cukai untuk kaum pemodal akan diutamakan. Dalam masa yang sama mereka yang miskin akan berselirat dengan cukai mukai. Kalau tidak percaya sila tunggu cukai baru : Cukai Barang dan Khidmat. Akan terlondeh seluar dalam Mak Minah dan akan tergadai Cupcai Pak Ali bila cukai ini sampai.

Jika masih belum yakin biar saya nyatakan satu lagi contoh terbaik : lihat apa yang terjadi kepada dasar kerajaan Pakatan Selangor yang melarang bangunan didirikan di lereng bukit. Ini cita-cita Pakatan Rakyat ketika berkempen untuk membawa kebaikan dan keselamatan kepada warga. Lihat apa yang berlaku dibelakang tabir. Kaum pemodal – pemaju dan para kontrektor telah melobi. Akhirnya larangan ini ditarik kembali. Kenduri menarah bukit diteruskan kembali.

Lihat pula apa yang terjadi apabila berlaku runtuhan di Bukit Antarabangsa. Laporan yang ingin diumumkan oleh kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat Selangor gagal kerana laporan ini disimpai oleh Akta Rahsia. Akta seperti ini semuanya diwujudkan untuk memastikan kaum pemodal – syarikat pemaju , kontrektor dan syarikat air - terselamat dan keuntungan mereka terjamin. Yang mati terkambus telah selamat ditalkinkan - jangan buat bising biarkan badan mereka dimakan cacing.

Ini bukan tohmah, propaganda atau berita putar yang saya ajukan kerana saya muflis dan tidak memiliki harta kekayaan. Ini adalah hakikat dihadapan mata kita. Buka mata dan dengar. Buka telinga dan lihat. Klik komputer dan baca. Jangan menjadi Mat Malas. Ketuk kepala lutut dan goncangkan kepala untuk berfikir. Nilai dan fahami mana yang tohmah, mana yang putar alam dan apa dia kebenaran

Kaum pemodal dan para kapitalis bergerak dengan licik. Ketika ini kaum pemodal di Malaysia melihat dan membaca tanda-tanda politik yang sedang berlaku dalam negara ini. Mereka menyedari bahawa gaya dan politik lama yang selama ini membawa keuntungan yang amat lumayan tidak mungkin akan berterusan. Apa yang terjadi pada 8 March 2008 mengajar mereka untuk memahami bahawa warga dalam negara ini mahukan perubahan dan sedang menuntut hak demokratik mereka.

Dengan arif dan dengan wang ringgit - kaum pemodal merancang untuk melahirkan apa yang dipanggil sistem dua parti. Contoh sistem dua parti ini sedang kita lihat berjalan dengan lancar di United Kingdom dan di Amerika Syarikat. Di UK ada Parti Konservatif dan Parti Buruh. Di Amerika ada Parti Republican dan Parti Democrat.

Parti-parti ini bertukar ganti untuk menjalankan pentabiran. Madame Thatcher dari Parti Konservatif akhirnya diganti oleh Tony Blair dari Parti Buruh. George Bush Senior dari Republican di ganti oleh Bill Clinton dari Democrat. Kemudian Clinton di ganti oleh George Bush Junior yang kemudiannya digantikan pula oleh Barack Obama dari Parti Democrat.

Parti politik dan susuk yang memimpin pentabiran kelihatan ini bertukar berganti. Tetapi hakikatnya sistem ekonomi kapitalis tidak berubah. Inilah dia silap mata Pepsi Cola dan Coca Cola yang selama ini telah berjaya menipu. Kapitalisma tidak berganjak. Kaum pemodal tidak hilang keuntungan walau parti mana pun yang naik atau turun.

Justeru, perubahan antara Democrat ke Republican atau dari Konservatif ke Parti Buruh hanyalah satu ilusi untuk menipu orang ramai. Tidak ada apa-apa perubahan yang hakiki telah berlaku. Tuan punya bank masih kaya raya. Tuan punya kilang masih memerah tenaga buruh murah. Para kontrektor masih membalon orang ramai. Cukai masih di tahap yang sama. Kaum pemodal terus melipatkan gandakan keuntungan.

Orang ramai dan para pengundi digula-gulakan dengan perubahan dari parti ini ke parti itu. Dari presiden yang ini ke presiden yang itu. Ini adalah helah kaum pemodal agar orang ramai tidak akan menuntut perubahan sistem yang sedia ada.

Didalam kempen-kempen pilihan raya kita akan mendengar labon dan heboh heboh dari Mat Heboh yang ingin menjadi YB. Teliti dengan rapi : mereka semuanya berjanji untuk menubuhkan sebuah kerajaan yang lebih baik dari yang sedia ada.

Apa sebenranya janji-janji para Mat Heboh bakal YB ini? Mereka berjanji akan menjalankan pentabiran dengan lebih cekap, lebih amanah dan lebih bersih. Ini ertinya mereka berjanji akan menjadi Mat Heboh yang lebih cekap, lebih amanah dan lebih bersih kepada kaum pemodal. Merekalah Mat Heboh yang terbaik untuk mengendalikan sistem ekonomi kapitalis ini.

Tidak pernah kita mendengar bahawa yang haprak dan yang membawa kemudaratan terhadap umat manusia hari ini ialah sistem ekonomi kapitalis yang mengajukan rukun iman : keuntungan maksima.

Rukun iman inilah yang sedang membawa porak peranda kepada kita semua hari ini. Keuntungan maksima yang dijadikan rukun iman ini akan membolehkan apa sahaja dilakukan asalkan ianya membawa untung. Balak dikeluarkan kerana ianya membawa untung. Pelacur datang dari China kerana ianya membawa untung. Hospital diswastakan kerana ianya membawa untung. Dadah diniagakan kerana ianya membawa untung.

Jika kita menyedari hakikat ini maka kita tahu bahawa sistem dua parti ini adalah kong kalikong. Tidak ada apa apa perubahan hakiki yang akan berlaku jika yang diajukan untuk dipilih hanyalah siapa yang lebih cekap mentabir sistem kapitalis.

Adakah Barisan Nasional lebih baik untuk keuntungan kapitalis atau Pakatan Rakyat yang akan mentabir dengan baik sistem kapitalis ini? Jika ini yang dipersoalkan maka saya jamin kita semua kena tipu oleh kaum pemodal dengan sistem dua parti yang sedang mereka rancangkan.

Apa yang seharusnya kita tuntut bukan sistem dua parti. Bukan siapa yang lebih cekap dan lebih amanah mentabirkan sistem kapitalis. Yang wajib menjadi rukun iman kita ialah menghancurkan sistem ekonomi yang berasaskan keuntungan maksima. Yang menjadi rukun iman kita ialah kita berjuang untuk melahirkan sistem ekonomi yang berasaskan kebajikan untuk umat manusia.

Sistem dua parti atau dua ratus buah parti ini tidak memiliki apa-apa makna yang hakiki jika kita masih lagi dalam sistem ekonomi yang berimankan keuntungan maksima. Apa yang wajib kita sokong bukan mereka yang berijazah, berdatuk, bertun atau berserban - ini tidak penting. Yang penting ialah mereka yang kita pilih akan berani bangun berjuang untuk melahirkan satu sistem ekonomi yang berimankan kebajikan untuk manusia.

Kita jangan ditipu untuk diberi pilihan sama ada untuk membeli kasut Adidas atau kasut Puma. Kita mahukan kasut kulit yang baru. Kita jangan ditipu untuk memilih Coke Cola atau Pepsi Cola. Kita tidak mahu minuman itu. Kita mahu air advocado yang sehat untuk umat manusia.(TT)

nota: tulisan ini boleh diambil
untuk membuat kebaikan

Dicatat oleh Tukar Tiub pada 3:50:00 AM